5 thoughts on “A boy in Chongqing let go of a pet store cat. Who should “pay” by the child’s behavior?”
Sonja
I think the child’s behavior should be paid by the parents, because this is not an accident, but the child deliberately let go of the cat. A boy in Chongqing released a pet shop cat. The incident occurred in a pet shop in Jiangjin District, Chongqing. After showing a boy walking into the pet shop in the exposure video, he stayed in front of the dog cage. Essence After looking at the clerk for a while, the little boy opened the door of the cat cabinet and turned around, and the cat in the cat cabinet ran out. After the cat runs away, it has not been retrieved after many days of search. It is reported that the cat was stored in the store with a value of 20,000 yuan. The merchant contact the parents of the children, hoping that the parents can bear the loss. The parents of the child said that the clerk has certain responsibilities, and they are only willing to bear half of their responsibilities. This on the Internet caused heated discussions. Some netizens supported pet merchants to protect their rights with legal means. I think the child’s behavior should be paid by his parents, because the child’s behavior is obviously intentional. In this incident, the surveillance video clearly photographed the entire process. The child’s behavior of letting the cat is not unexpected, but the child deliberately did it. In the process of communicating with the child, the child’s behavior also determined that the child’s behavior was intentional. Because the child saw the pity of the cat and wanted to save the cat, he would let the cat go. Therefore, I think the child’s behavior should be paid by the parents. The clerk has fulfilled the responsibility in this process, but the parents’ parents did not fulfill their responsibilities to take care of their children. If this incident is not paid by the children’s parents, but the merchant bears half of the responsibility, which is obviously unfair to the merchant. Although the parents think that this cat may not be worth so much money, this can be determined by a business identification method to determine the value of the cat. But this is the same as who takes responsibility, and the responsibility that the child’s parents should assume must be assumed. In children’s growth, there may be various things. But when the child is in trouble, it is meaningless to blindly escape the problem. Only by facing the problem and trying to solve it, and give the child to guide education, can the child really grow from the problem.
The child’s naughty behavior must be paid by his parents, because the parents are the child’s guardian, and the child must be assumed accordingly if the child touches the laws and regulations or the illegal act. After entering the pet store, the cat cabinet opened a pet cat worth 20,000 yuan, which has caused huge economic losses to the pet shop, so children parents must bear the main responsibility. The child’s behavior is definitely very wrong, because for the pet store owner, this pet cat is worth 20,000 yuan, and the little boy let go of the pet cat’s direct loss to the boss, more Needless to say, the little boy opened the pet cat cabinet twice, and the clerk was bathing the dog at the time. During this period, the boy was stopped directly. Parents said they would bear the corresponding responsibility, but the compensation must be reasonable. The boy’s father believes that the cat’s value is actually not 20,000 yuan, so it is required to make reasonable compensation, but in any case, the boy’s father must be for the sake Buy it directly. The cats that have been released this time are a British short gold gradient cat worth 20,000 yuan. This kind of cat variety is very rare. It is precisely because of this night that the pet store was organized for one night. , From beginning to end, no traces of cats were found, so the boy’s father must have to make relevant compensation, and it must be compensated according to the original price. For this parent Direct economic losses have been caused by pet stores, and parents are responsible, but pet stores have certain responsibilities at the same time, because cats have pet shops, so pet shops have relevant rights and responsibilities to take care of the cats. This father’s father must pay for the boy’s behavior directly. Parents must have a good monitoring of the child, but the good thing is that the boy’s parents expressed their willingness to accept relevant compensation. Now the two parties are now both parties. Still in further negotiation.
There must be a bear parent behind the bear child. The appearance of the bear child often has the reason why a parent taught nothing. The reason why the child will let go of pet shop pets is because the result of not knowing that this will bring this is that the parents did not tell him the “rule”.
I think the child’s behavior should be paid by the parents, because this is not an accident, but the child deliberately let go of the cat. A boy in Chongqing released a pet shop cat. The incident occurred in a pet shop in Jiangjin District, Chongqing. After showing a boy walking into the pet shop in the exposure video, he stayed in front of the dog cage. Essence After looking at the clerk for a while, the little boy opened the door of the cat cabinet and turned around, and the cat in the cat cabinet ran out. After the cat runs away, it has not been retrieved after many days of search. It is reported that the cat was stored in the store with a value of 20,000 yuan. The merchant contact the parents of the children, hoping that the parents can bear the loss. The parents of the child said that the clerk has certain responsibilities, and they are only willing to bear half of their responsibilities.
This on the Internet caused heated discussions. Some netizens supported pet merchants to protect their rights with legal means.
I think the child’s behavior should be paid by his parents, because the child’s behavior is obviously intentional. In this incident, the surveillance video clearly photographed the entire process. The child’s behavior of letting the cat is not unexpected, but the child deliberately did it. In the process of communicating with the child, the child’s behavior also determined that the child’s behavior was intentional. Because the child saw the pity of the cat and wanted to save the cat, he would let the cat go.
Therefore, I think the child’s behavior should be paid by the parents. The clerk has fulfilled the responsibility in this process, but the parents’ parents did not fulfill their responsibilities to take care of their children. If this incident is not paid by the children’s parents, but the merchant bears half of the responsibility, which is obviously unfair to the merchant.
Although the parents think that this cat may not be worth so much money, this can be determined by a business identification method to determine the value of the cat. But this is the same as who takes responsibility, and the responsibility that the child’s parents should assume must be assumed.
In children’s growth, there may be various things. But when the child is in trouble, it is meaningless to blindly escape the problem. Only by facing the problem and trying to solve it, and give the child to guide education, can the child really grow from the problem.
The child’s naughty behavior must be paid by his parents, because the parents are the child’s guardian, and the child must be assumed accordingly if the child touches the laws and regulations or the illegal act. After entering the pet store, the cat cabinet opened a pet cat worth 20,000 yuan, which has caused huge economic losses to the pet shop, so children parents must bear the main responsibility.
The child’s behavior is definitely very wrong, because for the pet store owner, this pet cat is worth 20,000 yuan, and the little boy let go of the pet cat’s direct loss to the boss, more Needless to say, the little boy opened the pet cat cabinet twice, and the clerk was bathing the dog at the time. During this period, the boy was stopped directly. Parents said they would bear the corresponding responsibility, but the compensation must be reasonable. The boy’s father believes that the cat’s value is actually not 20,000 yuan, so it is required to make reasonable compensation, but in any case, the boy’s father must be for the sake Buy it directly.
The cats that have been released this time are a British short gold gradient cat worth 20,000 yuan. This kind of cat variety is very rare. It is precisely because of this night that the pet store was organized for one night. , From beginning to end, no traces of cats were found, so the boy’s father must have to make relevant compensation, and it must be compensated according to the original price. For this parent Direct economic losses have been caused by pet stores, and parents are responsible, but pet stores have certain responsibilities at the same time, because cats have pet shops, so pet shops have relevant rights and responsibilities to take care of the cats.
This father’s father must pay for the boy’s behavior directly. Parents must have a good monitoring of the child, but the good thing is that the boy’s parents expressed their willingness to accept relevant compensation. Now the two parties are now both parties. Still in further negotiation.
Of course, the child’s behavior is paid by the parents. The children are not so stupid. They are all smart and know what should not be done.
It should be paid by the child’s parents. Because the child’s behavior is caused by the parents’ no education.
There must be a bear parent behind the bear child. The appearance of the bear child often has the reason why a parent taught nothing. The reason why the child will let go of pet shop pets is because the result of not knowing that this will bring this is that the parents did not tell him the “rule”.