As a pet owner, of course, you have to be responsible, but you must also distinguish the situation. If a pet is simply hurting and the owner does not hurt others, it is just civil infringement. If the pet causes damage, the owner shall bear no fault liability, unless you have evidence to prove that the victim is intentional (such as a heart to make a pet, let the pet to bite, and then ask the pet owner for compensation) cause the pet to hurt it. Then ask the pet owner to compensate.
If the animal owner uses the fierce animal as the “tool” to retaliate others, instigating the fierce animal to grab or bite his hatred, then he is suspected of constituting [intentional homicide] or [intentional intention] Crime crime].
If the owner of the animal knows that his pet is fierce and let it go blindly, you will not take the rope in public places in public, so at this time, the owner may be suspected of constituting [ Harmly crime of public safety by dangerous methods].
In short, the specific case of specific cases, I feel that your situation should belong to the first, that is, civil infringement. If it is not particularly serious, sit down with the wounded and let the public mediate it to you , Accompany each other some money, take the other party to the hospital to get rabies vaccine, and pay a little nutritional fee.
The relevant provisions on the liability for breeding animal damage in Chapter 10 of the Infringement Responsibility Law:
Article 78 of animals that cause damage to others cause damage to others Animal breeder or manager shall bear the liability for infringement, but it can prove that the damage is caused by the intentional or major negligence by the infringer, and may not bear or reduce the responsibility. The violation of management regulations and failure to take safety measures to cause others to damage others, animal breeders or managers shall bear the infringement liability. Itly 80 Dangerous animals such as fierce dogs that are prohibited from breeding cause damage to others, and animal breeders or managers shall bear infringement liability. Is that the animals in the zoo causes damage to others, the zoo shall bear the liability of infringement, but those who can prove that they do their duties without responsibility. The animal that abandoned and escaped during abandonment and escape caused damage to others during the abandonment, and the primary animal breeder or manager shall bear the liability for infringement. The Article 83 Due to the fault of a third party that causes animals to cause others to damage others, the infringer can ask the animal breeder or manager to ask for compensation or the third party request compensation. After the animal breeder or manager compensates, he has the right to recover from the third party. It 84 The breeding animals shall abide by the law, respect the social morality, and shall not disrupt the lives of others.
As a pet owner, of course, you have to be responsible, but you must also distinguish the situation. If a pet is simply hurting and the owner does not hurt others, it is just civil infringement. If the pet causes damage, the owner shall bear no fault liability, unless you have evidence to prove that the victim is intentional (such as a heart to make a pet, let the pet to bite, and then ask the pet owner for compensation) cause the pet to hurt it. Then ask the pet owner to compensate.
If the animal owner uses the fierce animal as the “tool” to retaliate others, instigating the fierce animal to grab or bite his hatred, then he is suspected of constituting [intentional homicide] or [intentional intention] Crime crime].
If the owner of the animal knows that his pet is fierce and let it go blindly, you will not take the rope in public places in public, so at this time, the owner may be suspected of constituting [ Harmly crime of public safety by dangerous methods].
In short, the specific case of specific cases, I feel that your situation should belong to the first, that is, civil infringement. If it is not particularly serious, sit down with the wounded and let the public mediate it to you , Accompany each other some money, take the other party to the hospital to get rabies vaccine, and pay a little nutritional fee.
The relevant provisions on the liability for breeding animal damage in Chapter 10 of the Infringement Responsibility Law:
Article 78 of animals that cause damage to others cause damage to others Animal breeder or manager shall bear the liability for infringement, but it can prove that the damage is caused by the intentional or major negligence by the infringer, and may not bear or reduce the responsibility.
The violation of management regulations and failure to take safety measures to cause others to damage others, animal breeders or managers shall bear the infringement liability.
Itly 80 Dangerous animals such as fierce dogs that are prohibited from breeding cause damage to others, and animal breeders or managers shall bear infringement liability.
Is that the animals in the zoo causes damage to others, the zoo shall bear the liability of infringement, but those who can prove that they do their duties without responsibility.
The animal that abandoned and escaped during abandonment and escape caused damage to others during the abandonment, and the primary animal breeder or manager shall bear the liability for infringement.
The Article 83 Due to the fault of a third party that causes animals to cause others to damage others, the infringer can ask the animal breeder or manager to ask for compensation or the third party request compensation. After the animal breeder or manager compensates, he has the right to recover from the third party.
It 84 The breeding animals shall abide by the law, respect the social morality, and shall not disrupt the lives of others.