5 thoughts on “Do you deliberately kill others’ pet crimes?”
Rachel
It does not constitute a crime, but it constitutes civil infringement. Look at the nature and loss of behavior.
1. If it is a provocative behavior, there is evidence to prove that it will be arbitrarily damaged for more than 2,000 yuan, suspected crime; 2. crime. The relevant legal knowledge “The Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China” Article 293 [Crime of provocation] with the following provocations, destroying social order, will be less than five years or less One sentence, detention or control: (1) beating others at will, the circumstances are bad; (2) chase, intercept, abuse, intimidation of others, bad circumstances; (3) Strong If you want to damage or occupy public and private property arbitrarily, the circumstances are serious; (4) troubles in public places, causing serious chaos in public places. If gathering others to implement the preceding paragraph many times and severely destroy social order, it is imprisoned for five years and less than ten years, and can be punished with fines.
1. The liability for the damage of animals shall be borne by everyone or manager
The damage to breeding animals is a more common type of infringement. If the animals cause damage to others, the animal breeder or manager shall bear the liability of infringement, but it can prove that the damage is caused by the intentional or major negligence of the infringer, and may not bear or reduce the responsibility. If the abandoned and escaped animals cause damage to others during the abandonment and escape, the raw animal breeder or manager shall bear the liability for infringement. Animal breeders usually refer to animal owners, while animal managers refer to the actual controller or restraint of animals. The so -called damage to others here includes personal damage or property damage to different degrees of others.
It can be seen that my country takes strict principles of blame for raising animals. It does not require animal breeders or managers to have a subjective fault that constitutes infringement. But at the same time, the article also stipulates a certain exemption or reduction of liability. Therefore, animal breeders or managers assume the infringement responsibility of breeding animals to the following three constituent elements at the same time: one is the illegality of behavior, that is, the harmful behavior of breeding animals; the other is to cause damage; the third is that The damage behavior of breeding animals and the consequences of damage have a causal relationship. The specific ways of animal damage to infringement are mainly to compensate for losses and apologies.
For example, when the plaintiff Li was walking his own tea cup dog, he encountered an unbound dog chain golden hair dog raised by the defendant Wang. After a few days of injuries, he was seriously euthanized. Li asked the court to order Wang to bear the cost of buying dogs, raising fees, inspection and euthanasia for a total of 20,000 yuan. After the court trial, the casualties of the tea cup dog were caused by Wang’s golden retriever, and there was no evidence that it was caused by Li’s intentional or major negligence. Let him compensate Li for 12,000 yuan and apologize in writing.
In the above news links, the golden retriever raised by the old uncle bite the poodle of others, which is a case of property damage that causes others to have a certain value. Or for infringement civil liability such as apology, and the claim of the above infringement liability is exactly the correct way to defend the owner of the poodle and obtain the relief office.
The noteworthy is that when the infringer has intentionally or major negligence, it can be reduced or exempted from the infringement liability of animal breeders or managers according to the specific circumstances. For example: Dong picked up a stray dog with a dog chain on the street, and tied the dog to a nearby tree while playing cards. When Liu, Liu, and his family, happened to be bitten by the dog. After the incident, Dong transferred the dog to the outsider. After hearing, the court believed that Dong actually controlled the dog after picking up the stray dog. Later, the dog bit Liu and Dong, as a manager, should bear the corresponding infringement liability. At the same time, when the puppy has been tied to the tree, Liu is bitten as a person -free ability, and his guardian has major faults, so he should reduce Dong’s infringement liability.
If in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, the infringer has the obligation to prove that the infringement facts and the murderous animals are owned or managed by the infringer, otherwise the appeal will not be supported. It is worth noting that in the incident of stray dogs, only the stray dogs are adopted or actual control can be taken responsible. Occasionally feeding and allowing stray dogs to play with their breeding dogs does not constitute a stray stray stray stray stray behavior. Dog’s adoption or actual control.
Pay content for time limit to check for freenAnswer Hello, I am Baidu’s cooperative lawyer, and I am glad to serve younIt does not constitute a crime, but it constitutes civil infringement. Look at the nature and loss of behavior. 1. If it is a provocative behavior, there is evidence to prove that it will be damaged by any more than 2,000 yuan, suspected crimes; Relevant legal knowledge “Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China” Article 293 [Crime of provoking trouble] has one of the following provocations, destroying social order, and sentenced to less than five years in prison, detention or control: (1) beating at will at will Other people, the circumstances are bad; (2) chasing, intercepting, insulting, and intimidation of others, the circumstances are bad; (3) Forced hard or arbitrarily damaged and occupied public and private property, the circumstances are serious; (4) Caused the order of public places seriously chaotic. If others have implemented the preceding paragraph many times, if they seriously destroy social order, they are imprisoned for five years and less than ten years, and they can be fined.
Look at the nature and loss of behavior. Essence If it is a provocative behavior, there is evidence to prove that it will be arbitrarily damaged by more than 2,000 yuan, and the crime is suspected; If it is deliberately destroyed the property, there is evidence to prove that the destruction of more than 5,000 yuan is suspected of crime. Essence Essence
In the criminal law, there is no protection of pet’s right to life, and generally does not constitute a crime, but personally, if you think that pets are very expensive, maybe you can consider intentionally destroying property and crime.
It does not constitute a crime, but it constitutes civil infringement. Look at the nature and loss of behavior.
1. If it is a provocative behavior, there is evidence to prove that it will be arbitrarily damaged for more than 2,000 yuan, suspected crime;
2. crime.
The relevant legal knowledge
“The Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China”
Article 293 [Crime of provocation] with the following provocations, destroying social order, will be less than five years or less One sentence, detention or control:
(1) beating others at will, the circumstances are bad;
(2) chase, intercept, abuse, intimidation of others, bad circumstances;
(3) Strong If you want to damage or occupy public and private property arbitrarily, the circumstances are serious;
(4) troubles in public places, causing serious chaos in public places.
If gathering others to implement the preceding paragraph many times and severely destroy social order, it is imprisoned for five years and less than ten years, and can be punished with fines.
1. The liability for the damage of animals shall be borne by everyone or manager
The damage to breeding animals is a more common type of infringement. If the animals cause damage to others, the animal breeder or manager shall bear the liability of infringement, but it can prove that the damage is caused by the intentional or major negligence of the infringer, and may not bear or reduce the responsibility. If the abandoned and escaped animals cause damage to others during the abandonment and escape, the raw animal breeder or manager shall bear the liability for infringement. Animal breeders usually refer to animal owners, while animal managers refer to the actual controller or restraint of animals. The so -called damage to others here includes personal damage or property damage to different degrees of others.
It can be seen that my country takes strict principles of blame for raising animals. It does not require animal breeders or managers to have a subjective fault that constitutes infringement. But at the same time, the article also stipulates a certain exemption or reduction of liability. Therefore, animal breeders or managers assume the infringement responsibility of breeding animals to the following three constituent elements at the same time: one is the illegality of behavior, that is, the harmful behavior of breeding animals; the other is to cause damage; the third is that The damage behavior of breeding animals and the consequences of damage have a causal relationship. The specific ways of animal damage to infringement are mainly to compensate for losses and apologies.
For example, when the plaintiff Li was walking his own tea cup dog, he encountered an unbound dog chain golden hair dog raised by the defendant Wang. After a few days of injuries, he was seriously euthanized. Li asked the court to order Wang to bear the cost of buying dogs, raising fees, inspection and euthanasia for a total of 20,000 yuan. After the court trial, the casualties of the tea cup dog were caused by Wang’s golden retriever, and there was no evidence that it was caused by Li’s intentional or major negligence. Let him compensate Li for 12,000 yuan and apologize in writing.
In the above news links, the golden retriever raised by the old uncle bite the poodle of others, which is a case of property damage that causes others to have a certain value. Or for infringement civil liability such as apology, and the claim of the above infringement liability is exactly the correct way to defend the owner of the poodle and obtain the relief office.
The noteworthy is that when the infringer has intentionally or major negligence, it can be reduced or exempted from the infringement liability of animal breeders or managers according to the specific circumstances. For example: Dong picked up a stray dog with a dog chain on the street, and tied the dog to a nearby tree while playing cards. When Liu, Liu, and his family, happened to be bitten by the dog. After the incident, Dong transferred the dog to the outsider. After hearing, the court believed that Dong actually controlled the dog after picking up the stray dog. Later, the dog bit Liu and Dong, as a manager, should bear the corresponding infringement liability. At the same time, when the puppy has been tied to the tree, Liu is bitten as a person -free ability, and his guardian has major faults, so he should reduce Dong’s infringement liability.
If in accordance with relevant laws and regulations, the infringer has the obligation to prove that the infringement facts and the murderous animals are owned or managed by the infringer, otherwise the appeal will not be supported. It is worth noting that in the incident of stray dogs, only the stray dogs are adopted or actual control can be taken responsible. Occasionally feeding and allowing stray dogs to play with their breeding dogs does not constitute a stray stray stray stray stray behavior. Dog’s adoption or actual control.
Pay content for time limit to check for freenAnswer Hello, I am Baidu’s cooperative lawyer, and I am glad to serve younIt does not constitute a crime, but it constitutes civil infringement. Look at the nature and loss of behavior. 1. If it is a provocative behavior, there is evidence to prove that it will be damaged by any more than 2,000 yuan, suspected crimes; Relevant legal knowledge “Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China” Article 293 [Crime of provoking trouble] has one of the following provocations, destroying social order, and sentenced to less than five years in prison, detention or control: (1) beating at will at will Other people, the circumstances are bad; (2) chasing, intercepting, insulting, and intimidation of others, the circumstances are bad; (3) Forced hard or arbitrarily damaged and occupied public and private property, the circumstances are serious; (4) Caused the order of public places seriously chaotic. If others have implemented the preceding paragraph many times, if they seriously destroy social order, they are imprisoned for five years and less than ten years, and they can be fined.
Look at the nature and loss of behavior. Essence
If it is a provocative behavior, there is evidence to prove that it will be arbitrarily damaged by more than 2,000 yuan, and the crime is suspected;
If it is deliberately destroyed the property, there is evidence to prove that the destruction of more than 5,000 yuan is suspected of crime. Essence Essence
In the criminal law, there is no protection of pet’s right to life, and generally does not constitute a crime,
but personally, if you think that pets are very expensive, maybe you can consider intentionally destroying property and crime.